sensor data

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=sensor+data&cp=
11&pf=p&sclient=psy&site=&source=hp&aq=0l&aqi=&aql=&oq=SENCOR+
DATA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=5b04e075ff8ff47d&biw=1280&bih=646

http://www.neoninc.org

http://thegiganticheartlessmultinationalcorporation.com/id618.htm           
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/History/Pestilence_AH.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1383903/PaperPhone-The-smartphone-paper-shape-pocket.html

Battlechips: Darpa’s Next-Gen Micromachines

* By David Hambling
* March 6, 2009




Image: Micro Cryogenic Cooler/Darpa
The Pentagon’s premiere research shop is working to shrink all kinds of devices — from cryogenic coolers to vacuum pumps to radar to infra-red video cameras —
down to the size of a chip. If it works, it could mean whole new classes
of weapons and sensors for the American military — and new gadgets for the rest of us.
In yesterday’s Guardian (see following), I described some of Darpa’s remarkable programs to reduce all sorts of devices to microchip scale. The idea is to produce, eventually, a new generation of "matchbook-size, highly integrated device and micro system architectures" including "low-power, small-volume, lightweight, microsensors, microrobots and microcommunication systems."
For the last several years, research circles have been buzzing, with talk of "lab-on-a-chip" sensors. These small devices used to detect and identify bacteria, viruses and other items of interest; as the name suggests, they are constructed on a micro-scale, so they can work with tiny amounts of material and (because distances and heat capacities are small) produce extremely fast results. Turns out, many of the developments in the itty-bitty lab world can be traced back to Darpa. In fact, one of the agency’s five divisions devoted to nothing but these microtechnologies.
Cooling is an issue for certain types of electronic components, such as thermal imaging sensors and anything superconducting. Providing this sort of cooling usually requires a supply of liquid and a lot of power, but Darpa’s Low Power Micro Cryogenic Cooler should solve that. It uses "micromachined thermal isolation structure" — cooling by the thermoelectric effect, when a current is applied.
Using just a 10th of a watt of power, it’s supposed to chill a 4-cubic-centimeter volume to 200 degrees below zero. That means it can chill one specific component of a mini-machine, not a whole device.
Darpa is a little vague about what’ll become of this technology: "Transition of this technology is anticipated through industry, who will incorporate elements of the technology in current and future weapon system design," the agency notes.
One program that does have specific applications is Microsensors for Imaging (MISI). This aims to build extremely small cameras working in the shortwave infrared spectrum. Specifically, the program is focusing on a 10-gram version for microair vehicles (MAVs), as wel as a 200-gram, head-mounted system. The MAV version will have a "target recognition range" of at least 100 meters and a 40-degree field of view, with "high optical quality." Being on silicon, as well as being smaller, should make it very robust and reliable, compared to existing cameras.
This sounds like another handy device to have available. Once such a camera is available and can be cheaply mass-produced (another advantage of having it all on a chip) all sorts of applications become feasible. Sensors for intruder detection? Off-the-shelf plug-in video camera for your new ground robot? Terminal guidance system for bombs or missiles? Again, there are likely to be plenty of companies interested, and I suspect that foreign copies will turn up a few years later.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/03/battlechips-dar/




Re: DARPArama 3
Post by bigbunny on Aug 9, 2008, 3:17pm

Naval Researchers Organize Cold Fusion Confab
By Sharon Weinberger August 08, 2008 3:00:00 PM



It's like the beginning of a bad joke: If a cold fusion conference
 took place in Washington, and no one heard about it, should
anybody care?

Even I'm not sure if I know the answer to that question, but I love unusual Pentagon and Beltway news so I'm posting it.
The fourteenth cold fusion conference is taking place in DC all next week, and two of they key organizers are scientists affiliated with the Naval Postgraduate School and the Naval Research Laboratory (scientists from the latter institution having long been involved in this controversial field).

Cold fusion, the catch-all phrase for research that follows in the footsteps of the 1989 announcement by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, has been anathema to much of the mainstream scientific community in the United States. But interestingly, cold fusion -- now referred to by some as "low energy nuclear reactions" -- has long maintained some U.S. military interest, particularly among naval researchers, occasionally at DARPA (at least under the current director), and nowadays at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), which, at one point, was considering funding some work in the area.

In fact, Pete Nanos, an associate director at DTRA and the former head of the Los Alamos lab, was originally the invited keynote speaker for the conference. But when I e-mailed Nanos to confirm his attendance, he wrote me back to say that he had decided to turn town the invitation.

Why was Nanos originally the invited keynote speaker? Who the heck knows, but Nanos is known for inviting controversy. In 2005, Pete "buttheads and cowboys" Nanos was famously drummed out of Los Alamos National Laboratory, where his brief tenure as director was widely regarded as a dark period for the lab that built the first atomic bomb. Anyhow, the keynote speaker is now the inimitable newsman Llewellyn King (full disclosure: my better half was once employed by King). What can I say? Small world.

Though I can honestly say it's probably worth it to go just to hear what King has to say,
I won't make it to the conference. But for those interested, agenda and other details
are available here:
 http://www.iccf-14.org/index.html

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/former-los-alam.html

http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=print&board=technosphere&thread=2219

Re: DARPArama III
Post by bigbunny on Nov 25, 2008, 8:29am

Army Launches $50 Million Videogame Push
By Noah Shachtman November 24, 2008 9:22:51 AM

[image]

The Army's Training and Doctrine Command is getting ready to pour $50 million into videogames that'll help troops get ready for combat.

Development won't start until 2010, Stars & Stripes reports. The games themselves wont be ready until 2015. By then, the U.S. military will be in its eighth decade, using games to prep troops for war -- starting with primitive, 1940s flight simulators bought from a Coney Island amusement park.

This isn't the Army's first stab at developing games, either. In 1999, the Army teamed up with gaming and Hollywood pros to found the Institute for Creative Technologies in Los Angeles; it's become one
of the world's most advanced schools for simulation-building. 2002 saw the debut of the wildly-successful shoot-em-up, America's Army, developed by the military as a recruiting tool.
 In 2004, the Army set up a videogame studio in North Carolina. Last year, Training and Doctrine Command opened a new office for gaming.

While soldiers wait to see the results from the Army's latest, $50 million gaming venture, troops
 around the world will get new gaming consoles.

Leslie Duvow, project director for gaming at PEO-STRI (Program Executive Office - Simulation and Training),
 tells Stars & Stripes that the Army will have 70 gaming systems in 53 locations in the United States, Germany,
 Italy and South Korea by September 2009.

"Each system will consist of 52 computers with ancillary equipment including steering wheels,
headsets and mice," she said.

Soldiers will be able to drive virtual vehicles, fire virtual weapons, pilot virtual unmanned aerial
vehicles and do "most anything a soldier does" in a virtual battle space as large as 100 kilometers
 by 100 kilometers, she said.

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/11/the-armys-train.html

Re: DARPArama III Post by bigbunny on Aug 6, 2010, 2:45am

U.S. Testing Pain Ray in Afghanistan (Updated Again)

* By Noah Shachtman
* June 19, 2010
[image]
The U.S. mission in Afghanistan centers around swaying locals to its side. And there’s no better persuasion tool than an invisible pain ray that makes people feel like they’re on fire.
OK, OK. Maybe that isn’t precisely the logic being employed by those segments of the American military who would like to deploy the Active Denial System to Afghanistan. I’m sure they’re telling themselves that the generally non-lethal microwave weapon is a better, safer crowd control alternative than an M-16. But those ray-gun advocates better think long and hard about the Taliban’s propaganda bonanza when news leaks of the Americans zapping Afghans until they feel roasted alive.
Because, apparently, the Active Denial System is “in Afghanistan for testing.”

An Air Force military officer and a civilian employee at the Air Force Research Laboratory are just two of the people telling Danger Room co-founder and AOL News ace Sharon Weinberger that the vehicle-mounted “block 2″ version of the pain ray is in the warzone, but hasn’t been used in combat.
[Update: "We are currently not testing the Active Denial System in Afghanistan," Kelley Hughes, spokesperson for the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, tells Danger Room.
So I ask her: Has it been tested previously? She hems and haws. "I'm not gonna get into operational," Hughes answers.
Hughes also disputes the assertion that Active Denial creates a burning feeling. "It's an intolerable heating sensation," she says. "Like opening up an oven door."]
For years, the military insisted that the Active Denial System — known as the “Holy Grail” of crowd control — was oh-so-close to battlefield deployment. But a host of technical issues hampered the ray gun: everything from overheating to poor performance in the rain. Safety concerns lingered; a test subject had to be airlifted to a burn center after being zapped by the weapon. (He eventually made a full recovery.) And then there were concerns about “the atmospherics” — how the locals might react — when they learned that the United States had turned a people-roaster on ‘em. “Not politically tenable,” the Defense Science Board concluded.
I pinged Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s staff about the use of Active Denial in Afghanistan. I’ll let you know if I hear anything back. But a few months ago, a source told me that a representative from the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate was in Afghanistan. Did that mean Active Denial was about to be put into action? Nope, the source said. “She’s just out getting some atmospherics on the use of non-lethals.”
Update 2: “The active denial system is in the country,” e-mails Lt. Col. John Dorrian, a spokesman for Gen. McChrystal. “However, it has not been used operationally and no decision has been made at this time to deploy it.”

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/06/..../#ixzz0vumPTTkb


Then:

U.S. withdraws ‘pain ray’ from Afghan war zone

By Mail On Sunday Reporter
Last updated at 2:45 PM on 28th July 2010

[image]
Pulled out: The Active Denial System, or 'Pain Ray' has been withdrawn from Afghanistan by the US military
A ‘pain ray’ that blasts the enemy with unbearable heat waves hasbeen pulled out of Afghanistan by the US military.
The Active Denial System (ADS), which cost about £42 million to develop, was on the brink of being deployed to disperse members of the Taliban as they attacked US forces.
The weapon, which causes immense pain to subjects but no lasting physical damage, was pulled from the war zone last week but US army chiefs in Afghanistan have stayed silent about the reason for the U-turn.
The ADS, which has been in development for almost 20 years, works by firing a beam of high-frequency waves at the speed of light.
The beam can cover a person’s entire body, causing agonising pain as it heats water and fat molecules beneath the skin’s surface.
The beam can hit someone up to a third of a mile away, and they are only relieved of the pain when they move out of the way.
A spokesperson from the American Department of Defence said: ‘The decision to recall the weapons back to the US was made by commanders on the ground in Afghanistan.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnew....l#ixzz0voGANZAP

http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=print&board=technosphere&thread=2219

Is The U.S. using new experimental "Tactical High Energy Laser" weapons in Iraq? “Star Wars in Iraq” is a new investigative report by Maurizio Torrealta and Sigfrido Ranucci. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13129.htm RAI 24 News - Run Time 25 Minutes According to official Pentagon sources, military vehicles equipped with this laser device have been used in Afghanistan to explode mines. According to two reliable military information sites – Defense Tech and Defence Industry Daily - at least three such vehicles are being used in Iraq as well and some people report having seen them.

Less
Re: DARPArama III
Post by bigbunny on Aug 29, 2008, 10:57am

Controversial Nuke Research Quietly Returns...
By David Hambling August 25, 2008 1:20:53 PM



Nuclear isomers are back. The controversial field of exploiting excited nuclei, to release atomic energy on demand, was brought low a years back, after some controversial experiments – and some loose talk of creating an "nuclear hand grenade." Now, the field is beginning to thrive once again, as I report in the Guardian. But mindful of earlier controversies, the researchers are keeping a low profile.

It's hard to overstate just how divisive the topic is. Critics have consistently poured scorn on Carl Collins' claims that he had successfully got a sample of the Hafnium 178m2 isomer to release an enormous amount of gamma radiation -- despite only putting a relative small bit of energy in. Skeptics say his work lacks a sound theoretical basis, and only groups associated with Collins have replicated his results, not indepedent researchers. As a result, research in this area has faced some very determined and organized opposition, which forced the cancellation of Darpa's original program. New Scientist rated the Hafnium Bomb as Darpa's #1 failure (ahead of psychic spying and the Orion nuclear-bomb-powered spacecraft). In fellow DANGER ROOM blogger Sharon's book, Imaginary Weapons, isomer research became the poster child for bad military science. [Many Pentagon bigwigs keep a copy of the book on their desks, as a reference for what to avoid when backing a new research program -- ed.]

The issue turns on metastable nuclear isomers. In the nucleus of a normal atom, the particles are in the lowest energy state. In a metastable isomer they have absorbed energy and are in an excited state. Normally (as with other nuclear decay), the atoms will release the energy randomly after a period of time; the question is whether, given the correct stimulation (from an x-ray, say), they can be prompted to release their energy on demand. The process is known as "triggering." Collins says he showed it could be done, and that his colleagues pulled it off, too. Critics demanded that the triggering experiments be replicated independently -- a bedrock principle of the scientific method. Collins never could. And, for a while, it appeared as if the American government might get out of the isomer-triggering game.

To this day, researchers working on isomers remain skittish about talking to the press; nobody wants to be the next bad science poster boy. However, it turns out that there are quite a few military isomer programs going on at present; the US Army, Navy and DTRA all have their own. There has been work at the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment here in Britain. Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are continuing their long-standing work in this field; not long ago, they were among the loudest critics of Collins' claims.

Most researchers are careful to distance themselves from the earlier research. Specifically, they're either looking at different materials or different transitions. The idea now is very much geared towards eventually, someday using nuclear isomers as super-batteries -- rather than as bombs. This is new isomer triggering, and nothing like the old isomer triggering. The concern is that attitudes to their work will be tainted by the similarities.

“One should differentiate between an ‘isomer program’ and what might be called the ‘hafnium program’” warns James Carroll, a Pentagon-funded researcher at Youngstown State University.

“The former… has added significantly to the body of science, as documented by many peer-reviewed and published results that have achieved acceptance in the nuclear physics community. The ‘hafnium program’ was focused, to my knowledge, on proving a specific claimed effect that has even now not been successfully observed by any independent and skeptical group. It would be a shame to throw the baby out with the bath water by equating these two overlapping, yet distinct programs with quite different aims and outcomes.”

The Army research program, known as On-Demand High Energy Density Materials, seeks to develop a nuclear battery that can be turned on an off at will. That opens up the prospect of being able to store a hundred thousand times as much energy as conventional batteries in a "deployable micro-reactor," or as long-lasting power sources for remote sensors:

This paper discusses our selection of the isomer that seems most promising, estimates of the energy cost compared to the alternatives, and the radiation measurements made to date. This approach differs dramatically from suggestions for use of isomeric materials in explosives applications.

However, the Army team have also done some work on the economics involved. By their estimate, isomer power is going to be expensive and only suitable for low-energy applications. Electric cars with isomer power sources are not going to be filling the roads any time soon. They mights, however, increase the endurance of dragonfly-sized micro air vehicles from minutes to days.

Even Collins' critics at Lawrence Livermore are pushing ahead with their ongoing isomer research. Back in 2001, they announced "new results that strongly contradict recent reports claiming an accelerated emission of gamma rays from the nuclear isomer 31-yr Hafnium." By last year, they were declaring that they were ready to demonstrate isomer triggering in Thorium-229.

But this is not a road-to-Damascus conversion. Researchers at Livermore have been working on isomer triggering for years. They have never said that isomer triggering was impossible, just that they did not believe Collins' claims. One of the lead researchers is John Becker, who was part of the team that critiqued the 1999 results. Speaking of their own work, one scientist says:

“This would then be the first time human control would be exerted over nuclear levels,” said Peter Beiersdorfer, an LLNL physicist and co-author of a paper that appears in the April 6 issue of Physical Review Letters.

Looks like Lawrence Livermore is intent on claiming this world first for themselves. However, not everyone dismisses the earlier results or the possibility of an isomer bomb, as we will see in Part 2.

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/from-pseudoscie.html


Star Wars in Iraq (vostfr)         
http://stagevu.com/video/eaewvmdlohma


Re: DARPArama III
Post by bigbunny on Jun 20, 2009, 8:21pm

Brain will be battlefield of future, warns US intelligence report

The human brain could become a battlefield in future wars, a new report predicts, including 'pharmacological land mines' and drones directed by mind control

* Ian Sample
* guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 13 August 2008 17.23 BST



Rapid advances in neuroscience could have a dramatic impact on national security and the way in which future wars are fought, US intelligence officials have been told.

In a report commissioned by the Defense Intelligence Agency, leading scientists were asked to examine how a greater understanding of the brain over the next 20 years is likely to drive the development of new medicines and technologies.

They found several areas in which progress could have a profound impact, including behaviour-altering drugs, scanners that can interpret a person's state of mind and devices capable of boosting senses such as hearing and vision.

On the battlefield, bullets may be replaced with "pharmacological land mines" that release drugs to incapacitate soldiers on contact, while scanners and other electronic devices could be developed to identify suspects from their brain activity and even disrupt their ability to tell lies when questioned, the report says.

"The concept of torture could also be altered by products in this market. It is possible that some day there could be a technique developed to extract information from a prisoner that does not have any lasting side effects," the report states.

The report highlights one electronic technique, called transcranial direct current stimulation, which involves using electrical pulses to interfere with the firing of neurons in the brain and has been shown to delay a person's ability to tell a lie.

Drugs could also be used to enhance the performance of military personnel. There is already anecdotal evidence of troops using the narcolepsy drug modafinil, and ritalin, which is prescribed for attention deficit disorder, to boost their performance. Future drugs, developed to boost the cognitive faculties of people with dementia, are likely to be used in a similar way, the report adds.

Greater understanding of the brain's workings is also expected to usher in new devices that link directly to the brain, either to allow operators to control machinery with their minds, such as flying unmanned reconnaissance drones, or to boost their natural senses.

For example, video from a person's glasses, or audio recorded from a headset, could be processed by a computer to help search for relevant information. "Experiments indicate that the advantages of these devices are such that human operators will be greatly enhanced for things like photo reconnaissance and so on," Kit Green, who chaired the report committee, said.

The report warns that while the US and other western nations might now consider themselves at the forefront of neuroscience, that is likely to change as other countries ramp up their computing capabilities. Unless security services can monitor progress internationally, they risk "major, even catastrophic, intelligence failures in the years ahead", the report warns.

"In the intelligence community, there is an extremely small number of people who understand the science and without that it's going to be impossible to predict surprises. This is a black hole that needs to be filled with light," Green told the Guardian.

The technologies will one day have applications in counter-terrorism and crime-fighting. The report says brain imaging will not improve sufficiently in the next 20 years to read peoples' intentions from afar and spot criminals before they act, but it might be good enough to help identify people at a checkpoint or counter who are afraid or anxious.

"We're not going to be reading minds at a distance, but that doesn't mean we can't detect gross changes in anxiety or fear, and then subsequently talk to those individuals to see what's upsetting them," Green said.

The development of advanced surveillance techniques, such as cameras that can spot fearful expressions on people's faces, could lead to some inventive ways to fool them, the report adds, such as Botox injections to relax facial muscles.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/aug/13/military.neuroscience





http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=print&board=technosphere&thread=2219

Re: DARPArama III
Post by bigbunny on Nov 25, 2008, 8:29am

Army Launches $50 Million Videogame Push
By Noah Shachtman November 24, 2008 9:22:51 AM

[image]

The Army's Training and Doctrine Command is getting ready to pour $50 million into videogames
that'll help troops get ready for combat.

Development won't start until 2010, Stars & Stripes reports. The games themselves wont be ready until 2015. By then, the U.S. military will be in its eighth decade, using games to prep troops for war -- starting with primitive, 1940s flight simulators bought from a Coney Island amusement park.

This isn't the Army's first stab at developing games, either. In 1999, the Army teamed up with gaming and Hollywood pros to found the Institute for Creative Technologies in Los Angeles; it's become one
 of the world's most advanced schools for simulation-building. 2002 saw the debut of the wildly-successful shoot-em-up, America's Army, developed by the military as a recruiting tool. In
 2004, the Army set up a videogame studio in North Carolina. Last year, Training and Doctrine Command opened a new office for gaming.

While soldiers wait to see the results from the Army's latest, $50 million gaming venture, troops
 around the world will get new gaming consoles.

Leslie Duvow, project director for gaming at PEO-STRI (Program Executive Office - Simulation
and Training), tells Stars & Stripes that the Army will have 70 gaming systems in 53 locations in
 the United States, Germany, Italy and South Korea by September 2009.

"Each system will consist of 52 computers with ancillary equipment including steering wheels,
headsets and mice," she said.

Soldiers will be able to drive virtual vehicles, fire virtual weapons, pilot virtual unmanned aerial
vehicles and do "most anything a soldier does" in a virtual battle space as large as 100 kilometers by 100 kilometers, she said.

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/11/the-armys-train.html

http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=print&board=technosphere&thread=2219


http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/statue/1032/id526.htm

Star Wars in Iraq (vostfr)         
http://stagevu.com/video/eaewvmdlohma


Race Bating Gas Bag

http://johndenugent.com/john-de-nugent-for-president-of-the-americans



Pre-ColumbianMuslimsinAmericas
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/statue/1032/id539.htm
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/statue/1032/index.htm



http://web.archive.org/web/20030603172854/http://bikerodnkustom2.homestead.com/IBRKA.html



  Trying this again
addicted to plastic (what a waste)
click the pix below to download to a folder right click and save
the avi all are the same film just differnt links to differnt sources
they are not bit torrents and can generall be wached on any vid viwer...
do you use a mac or pc ?


Addicted To Plastic
http://stagevu.com/video/kitwqykqkwci

http://stagevu.com/video/bzqhwxcjchip

>From styrofoam cups to artificial organs, plastics are perhaps the most
ubiquitous and versatile material ever invented. No invention in the past
100 years has had more influence and presence than synthetics. But such
progress has had a cost. For better and for worse, no ecosystem or segment of...
Language: English; Views: 3922; Length: 85:04; Rating: Submitter: cretin
Addicted to Plastic (2008) DVDRip

http://stagevu.com/video/bzqhwxcjchip


[Addicted to Plastic (2008) DVDRip] (Addicted to Plastic 2008)
 Addicted to Plastic 2008

Language: English; Views: 999; Length: 85:04; Rating: Submitter: BadaBing
Addicted To Plastic (2009)

http://stagevu.com/video/xshjswrbarhx


Some Black Hurstery.Pre-ColumbianMuslimsinAmericas

http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/statue/1032/id539.htm




SOME BULLET POINTS

ifwallscouldtalk-
 http://www.mingus.charlesmingus3art.com/ifwallscouldtalk-_1253.html
   
 It aint rocket surgery  
 http://www.mingus.charlesmingus3art.com/it-aint-rocket-surgery--_1250.html

In a world in which information is like air, what happens to power?
New technologies and a closely related culture of collaboration present radical new
models of social organisation.This project brings together leading practitioners and
thinkers in this field and asks them to determine the opportunity for government.

 This website features all material being created during the making of the film.

http://web.archive.org/web/20101127020227/http://www.usnowfilm.com/

    Searching for videos with keywords "Us Now "    
    http://stagevu.com/search?for=Us+Now+&in=Videos

HTTP://WWW.DIEOFF.COM

  
 Us Now 2009 ( In a world in which information is like air, what happens to power? )          
 http://stagevu.com/video/aesnqgzegacy

Us Now - Part 1 of 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlqU1o3NmSw&feature=player_embedded

http://web.archive.org/web/20101130064139/http://www.usnowfilm.com/

In a world in which information is like air, what happens to power? New technologies
and a closely related culture of collaboration present radical new models of social organisation.
This project brings together leading practitioners and thinkers in this field and asks them to
determine the opportunity for government.This website features all material being created
during the making of the film.

    Searching for videos with keywords "Us Now "    
    http://stagevu.com/search?for=Us+Now+&in=Videos

    Video Info By: nYx64
    Category:Films and Movies Length:60:04  Resolution:1024 x 576 Filesize: 350 MB 
    Language:English Viewed: 15331 times

    (http://www.usnowfilm.com)
    New technologies and a closely related culture of collaboration present radical new models of
    social organisation. Can we all govern? Us Now looks at how 'user' participation could transform
     the way that countries are governed.

    "I think the internet is changing the relationship between citizen and state in quite subtle and
    far reaching ways. So for example the citizen has access to all this information that previously
    would not have been able to easily get hold of and politics and government is only slowly waking
    up to that fact." 'Us Now' tells the stories of the online networks whose radical self-organising
    structures threaten to change the fabric of government forever. Us Now follows the fate of
    Ebbsfleet United, a football club owned and run by its fans; Zopa, a bank in which everyone
    is the  manager; and Couch Surfing, a vast online network whose members share their homes with strangers.

    US ARMY NEW ARMEMMENT Activate Denial System
    http://stagevu.com/video/hjqbisvlmjun
    Video Info By:djdemonangel Category:News and Politics
    Length:2:15 Resolution:320 x 240,Filesize:11 MB
    Language:English Viewed:1066 times

    Activate Denial System, consists in employing microwaves with 95Ghz and projecting them on a given zone.
    The aerial capacity that you can observe on the video, in fact assembled on a vehicle, is of approximately
    650 meters. In two seconds the surface of the skin reached 65°C, which starts a reflex of escape. It would
    be necessary approximately 25 seconds so that the skin starts to burn.

You Never Saw This I Don’t Exist And This Situation Never Happened  DEP:CATS OUT OF THE BAG?

    
    Searching for videos with keywords "What In The World Are They Spraying "          
    http://stagevu.com/search?for=What+In+The+World+Are+They+Spraying+&in=Videos

      What in the world are they spraying (2010)
  http://stagevu.com/video/wxscucmbhvhx
    What In The World Are They Spraying? The Chemtrail/Geoengineering Cover-up by
Truthmedia Productions promises to have people looking up in the sky. Chemtrails
 have long been debated and producer Michael Murphy and director Paul Wittenberger
 teamed up with world renowned author and documentary...

    Language: English; Views: 1495; Length: 97:44; Rating:
    Submitter: cretin

    What in the world are they spraying G Edward Giffin 2010
    Chemtrails exposed.
 
I have tried to keep my channel as politically content free as
 possible, as i feel this is not the place to voice political opinions or your personal
 views about the world, (all though I do carry some important films on my channel that
 should be watched). But this one is...
    Language: English; Views: 2075; Length: 97:44; Rating:

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl&q=Pacific%20Subtropical%20Gyre
How much for a real time view of the Pacific Gyre plastic zone so we can show the eminence scale of modern
economic plundering in the name of White Jeasus Weapons Drugs & Oil worlds failure to relate to nature. 
  
         





http://www.weatherspark.com 

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/




  The Tree of Life Trailer 2011 HD             
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLPe0fHuZsc