Selfl Lcking Ice Cream Cone      

Waterworld" Old wine old bottle... Whear's the beef? What's it made of what powers it? why enclave the city at sea? Build it in the deserts plenty dry there plenty power wind and solar... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1031438/Pictured-The-floating-cities-day-house-climate-change-refugees.html  Click here to print Pictured: The floating cities that could one day house climate change refugees By Daily Mail Reporter Last updated at 2:13 AM on 04th July 2008 At first glance, they look like a couple of giant inflatable garden chairs that have washed out to sea But they are, apparently, the ultimate solution to rapidly rising sea levels. This computer-generated image shows two floating cities, each with enough room for 50,000 inhabitants.         Enlarge   The 'Lilypad' cities would be powered by renewable energy sources Based on the design of a lilypad, they could be used as a permanent refuge for those whose homes have been  covered in water. Major cities including London, New York and Tokyo are seen as being at huge risk from oceans which could rise by as much as 3ft by the end of this century. This solution, by the award-winning Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, is designed to be a new place to live for those whose homelands have been wiped out. The 'Lilypad City' would float around the world as an independent and fully self-sustainable home. With a lake at its centre to collect and purify rainwater, it would be accessed by  three separate marinas and feature artificial mountains to offer the inhabitants a change of scenery from the seascape. Power for the central accommodation hub is provided through a series of renewable energy sources  including solar panels on the mountain sides, wind turbines and a power station to harness the energy of the waves.  Mr Callebaut said: 'The design of the city is inspired by the shape of the great Amazonia Victoria Regia lilypad. Some countries spend billions of pounds working on making their beaches and dams bigger and stronger. 'But the lilypad project is actually a long-term solution to the problem of the water rising.' The architect, who has yet to estimate a cost for his design, added: 'It's an amphibious city without any roads or any cars. The whole city is covered by plants housed in suspended gardens. 'The goal is to create a harmonious coexistence of humans and  nature.' 'Some countries spend billions of pounds working on making their beaches and dams bigger and stronger. 'But the Lilypad project is actually a long term solution to the problem of the water rising.'And it has the other objective of providing housing for refugees from islands that have been submerged.'                     Enlarge   The Lilypad city would house climate change refugees Centred around a lake which collects and then purifies rain  water, the Lilypad will drift around the world following the ocean currents and streams.It will be accessed by three marinas and will also feature three 'mountains' to offer the inhabitants a change of scenery.Power will be provide through a series of renewable energy sources including solar, thermal, wind energy, hydraulic and a tidal power station.The city will actually produce much more energy than it consumes and be entirely 'zero-emission' as all the carbon-dioxide and the waste will be recycled. Mr Callebaut added: 'It's an amphibious city without any roads or any cars.The whole city is covered by plants housed in suspended gardens. The goal is to create a harmonious coexistence of humans and nature.'I think trying to accomodate the  millions of people left homeless by environmental changes will prove to be one of the great challenges of the 21st century.' Neither the cost of building the city or the cost of living there have been revealed. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the global sea level is expected to rise between  nine and 88 centimetres by 2100, with a 'best estimate' of 50 centimetres.This is due to global warming which is causing  the ice caps to melt. In many places, 50 centimetres would see entire beaches being washed away, together with a significant chunk of the coastline.   On low-lying Pacific islands such as Tuvalu, Kiribati or the Maldives, the highest point is only two or three metres above current  sea levels.If the sea level was to rise by 50cm, significant portions of these islands would be washed away by erosion or covered by water. Even if they remain above the sea, many island nations will have their supplies of drinking water reduced because sea water will invade their freshwater stocks.There are also tens of millions of people living in low-level coastal areas of southern Asia, such as the coastlines of Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Burma, who would be in danger. Comments (9) Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below? The credibility of the IPCC sinks lower and lower as their wild claims about the future get sillier and sillier. There is no evidence that sea levels will rise by more than about 10cm (four inches) by 2100. They have been on the rise slowly ever since the end of the Little Ice Age, and there is no sign of any acceleration of the rate in recent times. If anything, the rate of rise is likely to decrease in coming years. The IPCC is ignoring the facts and relying on faulty computer models. There are currently no 'climate change refugees', and that is unlikely to  change in the foreseeable future. - Peter Warlow, Brentwood, UK, 03/7/2008 15:33 It makes perfect sense to take to the water - I think it looks beautiful, thank heavens there are people out there who  have the intelligence to think "outside the box". - Mary, Greensboro, NC, USA, 03/7/2008 15:32 I think these 'lily pads' are a great idea, they would make ideal 'prisons' thereby freeing up our land prisons ready to house all those young people who will be sentenced for carrying a knife/weapon. - Mrs Sue Morgan, Dover, England, 03/7/2008 14:48 http://www.pddnet.com/scripts/ShowPR.asp?RID=22891&CommonCount=0 Selfl Lcking Ice Cream Cone  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Selfl+Lcking+Ice+Cream+Cone++++&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= July 23, 2008 4:21 PM PDT In case you're too lazy to lick Posted by Jennifer Lowell Post a comment  http://www.cnet.com/kitchen-gadgets/?keyword=%22ice+cream%22   With all the energy you save by not turning the ice cream cone, you can...um...eat more ice cream. (Credit: blavish.com) Calories burned playing 30 minutes of basketball: 350. Calories burned taking a 30-minute yoga class: 160. Calories burned washing dishes for 30 minutes: 70. How about the number of calories I'd burn licking an ice cream cone for 30 minutes? About 25 (although if you take the calories from the ice cream into account, then you burn, well, negative 175 calories). That being said, can someone please tell me why anyone would possibly need this motorized ice cream cone? I'm no stranger to novelty candy. When I was in middle school, my friends and I would buy sweets by the grocery bagful and would use them as a local form of currency. The stranger candies would always be valued higher, since they usually came in containers that looked like paintbrushes, cars, milk jugs, or animals, and which could be kept and used to store other things (like our pog collections). Extra intrinsic value was awarded to anything that turned our tongues bright colors. But this motor cone, although in the same family as these novelty eats, somehow falls short. It doesn't advertise itself as being a novelty, but rather as an energy-saving invention. One supplier boasts, "No more manually rotating the cone! No drips, no mess!" Was rotating the cone all that difficult in the first place? And plus, isn't half of the fun of getting an ice cream cone getting to eat the crunchy ice cream-carrying vessel at the end? I can see people wanting a motorized ice cream cone. I can even see people purchasing one of them and enjoying it for several summers, and I'm not judging them. But if you're going to buy a motorized ice cream cone, be honest with yourself: buy it because it's a novelty, because it's strange, and because it may be a good conversation starter at a toddler's birthday party, and not because it's going to save you the 25 wrist-twisting and tongue-lapping calories. I'm not the only one who thinks this cone is a joke. Check out Napoleon Dynamite's Jon Heder test-driving the cone at 15 revolutions per minute. Avenue Vine: February 2007 Archives   Rudd qualified second, locking in a front-row starting spot last Sunday so he ...... Patty Bogle immediately stepped forward, and has been working selfl ... www.avenuevine.com/archives/2007_02.html - 729k - Cached - Similar pages Salman Rushdie - Satanic Verses   And wor se: because slobbering Dum sday had been licking his lips as his j ...... 2 Alleluia Cone, com ing down from Everest , saw a cit y of ice t o t he ... www.scribd.com/doc/2500355/Salman-Rushdie-Satanic-Verses - 977k - Cached - Similar pages created: Thu Jan 25 21:21:28 EST 2007 V i V aardvark V aardvarks V ...   ... V conduits V conduplicate V conduplication V cone V coned V coneflower V cones V ...... V selfhood V selfish V selfishly V selfishness V selfless V selfl. hood.kennesaw.edu:8080/cocoon/3323fa08/javasource/wordGraph.txt - 977k - Cached - Similar pages "self-licking ice cream cone" definition from Double-Tongued ...   A01: SDI has become “a self-licking ice cream cone. It serves no purpose except to consume itself.” 1992 Marvin Ott Wall Street Journal (Dec. ... www.doubletongued.org/index.php/dictionary/self_licking_ice_cream_cone/ - 36k - Cached - Similar pages Werther: Why We Fight   Perhaps the crucial mechanism in Mogadishu, and Kabul, and Baghdad is best described by that hoary Pentagon slang phrase, "the self-licking ice cream cone. ... www.counterpunch.org/werther01082007.html - 103k - Cached - Similar pages Theory of Self-Licking Ice Cream Cone to Replace Value Theory of ...   Theory of Self-Licking Ice Cream Cone to Replace Value Theory of Stock Pricing on Wall Street. November 6, 1999. Comment: #329. Discussion Thread: #s - 328 ... www.d-n-i.net/fcs/comments/c329.htm - 12k - Cached - Similar pages   Selfl Lcking Ice Cream Cone  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Selfl+Lcking+Ice+Cream+Cone++++&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=                Salman Rushdie - Satanic Verses                 http://www.scribd.com/doc/2500355/Salman-Rushdie-Satanic-Verses        Three-Gram 'Dragonfly' Takes Flight TU Delft recently presented the minute DelFly Micro air vehicle. This successor to the DelFly I and II weighs barely 3 grams, and with  its flapping wings is very similar to a dragonfly. Ultra-small, remote-controlled micro aircraft with cameras, such as this DelFly, may well be used in the future for observation flights in  difficult-to-reach or dangerous areas. The DelFly Micro is a 'Micro Air Vehicle' (MAV), an exceptionally small remote-controlled aircraft with camera and image recognition software. The Micro, weighing just 3 grams and measuring 10 cm (wingtip to wingtip) is the considerably smaller successor to the successful DelFly I (2005) and DelFly II (2006). The DelFly Micro, with its minuscule battery weighing just 1 gram, can fly for approximately three minutes and has a maximum speed of  5 m/s. Ultra-small remote-controlled, camera-equipped aircraft are potentially of great interest because they could eventually be used for observation flights in difficult-to-reach or dangerous areas. Nature The basic principle of the DelFly is derived from nature. The 'dragonfly' has a tiny camera (about 0.5 grams) on board that transmits its signals to a ground station. With software developed by TU Delft itself, objects can then be recognized independently. The camera transmits TV quality images, and therefore allows the DelFly II to be operated from the computer. It can be maneuvered using a joystick as if the operator was actually in the cockpit of the aircraft. The aim is to be able to do this with the DelFly Micro too. Miniaturization The development of the DelFly is above all the story of continuing miniaturisation of all the parts, from the DelFly I (23 grams and 50 cm)  via the DelFly II (16 grams and 30 cm) to the present DelFly Micro (3 grams and 10 cm). The DelFly II drew huge attention in 2006 because it could fly horizontally (21 km/hr) as well as hover, just like a hummingbird, and also  fly backwards. The DelFly Micro, incidentally, cannot do this just yet. In a few years time, the new objective of the project, the DelFly NaNo (5 cm, 1 gram) will have been developed. The Micro is an important intermediate step in this development process. A second objective for the future is for the DelFly to be able to fly entirely independently thanks to image recognition software. For more information on the Delfly, click here More from PD&D: The 3 Gs Of Hardware Selection Accurate Dispense Air Ventilation With Limited Liquid Infiltration Winning Student Designers Temperature Measurement: When Off-the-Shelf Won't Work http://www.pddnet.com/scripts/ShowPR.asp?RID=22891&CommonCount=0       Related Video Book Trailer: BLUE GENES I just wanted to share with you news of my new book coming out this Fall from Doubleday (September 16). It’s called BLUE GENES: A memoir of Loss and Survival. It’s the story of my family… There is a short video I made about the book on Random House’s site: http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780385525206&view=vidembed Enjoy! PS. You can pre-order the book, too!

http://www.oddmusic.com

Art & the Art of Managing Pain: Billy Bob  http://blog.beliefnet.com/flowermandalas/?source=GOOGLE&campaign=038&medium=CPC&nopop=1&WT.mc_id=GFMB038&WT.srch=1&gclid=CPH18NzKzJICFQkvgwoduSocbQ    Wednesday February 27, 2008 Category: Art, Creativity, Flower Mandalas, Healing, Mandalas, Spirituality, Transformation The 'Meaning' of Fifteen Flower Mandalas                                           Fifteen Flower Mandalas  I'd like to take this space to thank those of you who have downloaded my free Fifteen Flower Mandalas screensaver, and particularly those who have  written back. The responses so far have been interesting. Until now, I didn't know that people from all parts of the world -- from the tip of Alaska to Cape  Town and beyond -- were checking into this blog. That, alone, is gratifying. And I'm grateful to those of you who shared your positive responses to my work,  and to those, as well, who have shared their similar struggles with life, death, near-death, and everything in between. It has been, and continues to be, a  heart-warming bounty. Thank you. Several of you have asked me to send you, along with the screensaver, the "meaning" of each mandala. There's no simple answer to this question. I can list the flowers from which they were derived, and some feelings and thoughts that occur to me when I look at them, but I believe each viewer, if he or she meditates on a particular image, will come away from it with a different sense, one specific to that person in that moment. Here are the flowers. They match up, from top-left to bottom-right, with the mandalas in the above image. Row 1: Beach Rose, Blue Pansy, Dandelion Head, Daylily (rear view), Dying Amaryllis. Row 2: Galliardia 'Arizona Sun', Iris Germanica, Marigold, Pink Dahlia, Pink Peony. Row 3: Queen Anne's Lace, Violet Morning Glory, White Lily, White Rose, Yellow Lily. Some feelings I get (now, today): From the Beach Rose, love. From the Blue Pansy, stillness. From the Dandelion Head, rebirth. From the Dying Amaryllis, vastness and motion. From the Galliardia, surprise. From the Iris Germanica, a meeting of masculine and feminine energy. From the Marigold, momentum and stability (the 'flywheel'). From the Pink Dahlia, openness. From the Pink Peony, protection. From the Queen Anne's Lace, playfulness. From the Violet Morning Glory, a holy spirit. From the White Lily, complexity. From the White Rose, transformation. From the Yellow Lily, strength. What feelings do you get from these images? Let me know, either as a comment to this post or to in the Art, Healing, and Transformation group. More anon, and thanks in advance for your responses.See you in cyberspace, - David David J. Bookbinder, LMHC Request a free flower mandala screensaver: Fifteen Flower Mandalas © 2008, David J. Bookbinder Comments (4) Filed Under: flower mandalas, meaning, screensaver, spirituality http://blog.beliefnet.com/flowermandalas/?source=GOOGLE&campaign=038&medium=CPC&nopop=1&WT.mc_id=GFMB038&WT.srch=1&gclid=CPH18NzKzJICFQkvgwoduSocbQ

Follow the fifteen billion year long chain of events from the birth of the universe at the big bang    http://images.google.com/images?q=Follow+the+fifteen+billion+year+long+chain+of+events+from+the+birth+of+the+universe+at+the+big+bang&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi   Rebecca Dunnell Lothlorian Lothlorien Spaces unplayed 1983 private label original jim palmer sarod rebecca dunnell c flute alto bass bamboo flutes chris weigers string bass larry le masters tabla santoor bells ben clinesmith cello valerie dahlmann oboe english horn. Lothlorian 001 LP 17.54 More Info http://www.musicstack.com/seller.cgi?seller=34431&genre=New+Age&media Watercolor Mandalas   http://mingus.charlesmingus3art.com/watercolor-mandalas-_224.html

http://www.socialfiction.org/?archive=current/archive_27Feb2007.html      CRYSTALPUNK: We have always been here         HOME Become a Friend Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 info ** socialfiction ** org           Statement     What is Crystalpunk?!    Crystalpunk is a simpleton stampede, a coxcomb carnival, a daydreamers cabal, a platitude-peddling potlatch, a nihilists ambulation    on tiptoe, an incantation of the language in the corners of your eyes, a wild farrago of those who run before they can walk, an ABD   of being Free from the NOW! NOW! NOW! We wear non-matching socks: that is who we are!

[3/19/2008 10:17:15 PM]               http://www.fctec.com/fctec_pressDetails.asp?ID=44

Air Force Advanced Power Technology Office (APTO) Leads Multi-Service Aviation Milestone Event 02/02/2007 Robins AFB, Georgia– The Air Force Advanced Power Technology Office (APTO), headquartered at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia recently announced the first military airlift of a fuel cell powered military vehicle. The effort to convert the vehicle was a true multi-service collaboration including the U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center/Construction Engineering Research Laboratory’s Fuel Cell Test and Evaluation Center (FCTec), the U.S. Marine Corps, MAG-49 Det Bravo C-130 Airlift Unit and the U.S. Air Force APTO. The MB-4 Aircraft Towing Tractor, a four wheel drive, four wheel steer, 14,000 pound drawbar pull vehicle was converted from a diesel powered mechanical drive vehicle to a fuel cell powered electric drive vehicle. The integration effort, accomplished by Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, incorporates a Hydrogenics, Incorporated 65kW Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell system, Dynetek Industries’ carbon fiber wrap hydrogen storage system and Enova’s Panther 120 Drive System. The combination of these subsystems enables the vehicles towing capacity to remain unchanged, while the addition of a power inverter enhanced the vehicles capability by permitting power generated by the fuel cell to be delivered to aircraft and/or ancillary support equipment. The vehicle was transported to Hickam AFB, Hawaii by Marine C-130 airlift on the 20th of October, 2006. The vehicle will be put through a demonstration/validation program while in daily use at Hickam AFB. Visit CTC's Web Site     [3/19/2008 10:17:15 PM] http://www.fctec.com/fctec_pressDetails.asp?ID=44   Military’s Active Denial System is First True Ray Gun  John Dodge, Editor-in-Chief -- Design News, March 6, 2008    http://www.designnews.com/article/CA6538932.html?nid=2321&rid=464641439  << Return to Main Page   Print From the pages of Design News Military’s Active Denial System is  First True Ray Gun John Dodge, Editor-in-Chief --  3/6/2008 9:24:00 AM This breakthrough looks like an airport radar except the one rolled out to the media recently  is mounted on a hybrid Humvee. The operator sitting in the Humvee lines up the target and  fires a 95 GHz blast from a 100 kW ultra-high-frequency radio transmitter. The sensation at the target up to 500m away is akin to taking a heat blast from an opened “oven door,” according to Marine Corps. Col. Kirk Hymes. “This does not incapacitate them.  This pushes them back and out of the way,” he says. As such, the unit promises to be another tool for crowd control or for protection of Navy ships. “Navy ships have curious onlookers who try to push the envelope. Let’s steer closer to those big  Navy ships. But we have a tremendous responsibility to protect the men and women on that ship.  When there is mixture of terrorists and tourists and they are not readily moving back, this system  can be used to gently push those individuals back. It does not have a lasting effect,” he says, adding that the weapon’s development really accelerated after the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole in 2000 Indeed, the 1 mm radio wave penetrates the top 1/64th of an inch of skin and just down to the nerve endings. When hit, the target moves away from the beam and the sensation ceases. Each blast is four sec and in testing with 600 volunteers and 10,000 exposures, the Air Force, which has developed the technology over the past 15 years, claims there is only one tenth of a 1 percent chance of minor injury such as a blister or rash. The device comes at a time when the military is serving in a multitude of non-traditional roles such as peace-keeping and humanitarian efforts. “We have instances where helicopters had a hard time landing to deliver foodstuffs. Hunger is a pretty motivating factor and if I was senior member of my tribe or clan and I’ve watched my family die from hunger, I’ll do what it takes to get those foodstuffs. How do you non-lethally get them to stand in an orderly fashion so the food can be delivered safely and proportionally and protect those who aren’t in a rush? If you can target individuals to stay back, leave the area or form and orderly line, it only takes a couple of individuals to be targeted and it says there’s something going on here,” says  Col. Hymes. At the heart of the transmitter is a water-cooled gyrotron developed by CPI Inc. based in Palo Alto, CA. The gyrotron creates the radio frequency beam. The aiming device is comprised of “relatively simple” optics, which look down the center of beam. In addition to the Humvee-mounted unit, the Air Force has also built one containerized version, which is armored and enclosed to survive rugged environments. Each system     costs about $10 million, says Hymes.        Raytheon is the systems integrator.         The testing of the ADS itself has been proven and now focuses on how it can   be maintained and operated in challenging environments such as Iraq’s dust and heat.         Unless this electromagnetic radiati...... more >> Posted by: Mike Tait    3/19/2008 1:34:45 PM PT OK, 10 million each? How about ...... more >> Posted by: P. McLeod    3/19/2008 11:44:39 AM PT 95 GHz and 1mm wavelength allows us...... more >> Posted by: Chuck Britton    3/17/2008 4:30:59 PM PT Testing a heat ray in the summer. ...... more >> Posted by: Kenn Blade    3/17/2008 12:18:17 PM PT            Design News will explore this new weapon in depth in an upcoming issue. ADS System 0 Click below for more images:          1         2         3         4             © 2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.                      http://mingus.charlesmingus3art.com/klaxonballoons1-_744.html

index intro The Plan against the NWO  contact/feedback Grab Bag    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/132106/water_as_fuel/ Stan Meyer's Waterdriven Car http://100777.com/node/1266 Stan Meyer's Waterdriven Car Filed under: Energy http://www.free-energy.ws/electrolysis.html SUPER-EFFICIENT ELECTROLYSIS Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true under normal circumstances, but it is not true under ALL circumstances. When ordinary tap water is hit with a series  of high voltage impulses, using a system developed by Stan Meyer (USA) and again more recently by Xogen Power (Canada), it splits into Hydrogen and Oxygen  gas with significantly less electrical input. Even ordinary electrolysis can be made more efficient by using different electrolytes (additives that make the water conduct electricity better). For instance, Potassium Hydroxide works better than Sodium Hydroxide. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures on the electrodes work better than others. Stan Meyer used concentric tubes with very close tolerances instead of the standard practice of parallel flat plates. The implication is that unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact  that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen, with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make Hydrogen from water for free, forever. http://www.free-energy.ws/electrolysis.html May 21, 2005 - 08:35 From: http://www.free-energy.cc/electrolysis.html "...Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true only under the worst case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency, using a system developed by Stan Meyers (USA) and again recently by Xogen Power, Inc., it collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas with very little electrical input. Also, using different electrolytes (additives that make the water conduct electricity better) changes the efficiency of the process dramatically. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make Hydrogen from water for free, forever...." LINKS The following two links lead to videos of Stan Meyer's Water Fuel Cell technology: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67009/water_power_car/ http://www.lonelantern.org/stanmeyersvideo.html http://www.waterfuelcell.org   Categories - New World Order [l]  - Agencies, Commissions... [l]   - The UN [l]  - Jewry, "Israel", Zionism... [l]  - The Middle East  - Secret Societies [l]   - Illuminati [l] * Skull and Bones  - The Vatican [l] - Control [l]  - Brainwashing [l]  *MKULTRA   - Drugs [l]   - Feminism [l]   - Homosexuality [l]  - Television [l] - The USA [l]  - JFK [l] - The EU [l] - China [l] - Fake Terror [l]  - 911 [l]  - London 7/7 [ l]  *Oklahoma '95  *Pearl Harbor  - Archaeology & History [l]  - The Ark of The Covenant Possibly similar items Pentagon Strike CNN Reported No Plane Hit Pentagon. The Story of Stuff Oklahoma City Bombing: Startling evidence proves cover-up List of Morons Who Slipped Up And Practically Admitted 9/11 Was An Inside Job A collection of short video clips New WTC Implosion Video - Squibs John F Kennedy's bodyguards being told to stay away from JFK Clip of Apollo II press conference Freedom 101 Anti-NWO Rap Election 2008 Mike Gravel 12 Steps Introduction and Mission statement Filed under: June 27, 2003 - 16:49 This site is dedicated to Truthseekers. It's main purpose is to lead seekers on to  a MUCH more brighter source of information, and to help shed some light to a great  deal of things happening in this very mad world. Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high (places). http://100777.com/911/ Some good searches: http://www.100777.com/faketerror/ Bilderberg FEMA CIA MI6 Mossad NSA Global Warming Skull and Bones Microsoft Matrix Pearl Harbor Oklahoma '95 Iraq Iran Middle East MKULTRA COINTELPRO Operation Mockingbird Alex Jones Art Bell Fabianism Orwell Marx Hitler Even more categories : The VaticanChina "Truth Talk Radio" & the "non moving freedom movement"Letters This site is my tool to oppose the people and organisations who are anti-God, i.e anti- TRUTH, LOVE, and FREEDOM. If we are to live under God's Laws,  the perfect Sociological system then we must oppose them. God's Laws are the ONLY Laws legal on this planet. Again I must stress that the main purpose of this site is to lead people to an  infinately brighter source of information at another website: http://i.am/jah/ and to The Plan against the New World Order BBC NEWS World Have Your Say My view of Islam from Ali in Kuwait Actually, we don't know how the initial elements got here, but the simplest element we know is hyrodrogen. One Proton, one electron. ... http://www.blogs.bbc.co.uk/worldhaveyoursay2007/07/my_view_of_islam_from_ali_in_k.html  My view of Islam from Ali in Kuwait Ros Atkins 17 Jul 07, 02:56 PM Hi Ros and everyone at WHYS. I am a British convert to Islam (12 years ago). I listen to the World Service and your programme all the time in my car and I can't help but notice how many items concern Islam and Muslims, often in a negative light. This has been disturbing me for some time because I feel that Islam is not being properly presented or understood. I want to hear  the good things about Islam presented and debated... I find all the talk about moderate versus extreme or modern versus fundamental etc quite irrelevant and totally missing the point. Islam is a faith – a belief system based on funda mental principles, doctrines and texts. At the core is belief in the oneness of God and that Muhammad is His last Messenger. Islam is also a way of life. It is a religious way of life that puts worship of God at the centre. It makes no sense to talk of "secular Islam". The main objective of the secular movement is to put religion into a box and remove its influence from the core of society. Unfortunately many Muslims are happy to go along with this view, largely because it gives them a good excuse not to follow their religion. Here are a few examples of the benefits of a Muslim society where Muslims actually practise Islam: 1. It is free of alcohol and drugs and all the related disease, crime, costs etc. 2. The (extended) family is the fundamental building block of society. 3. Women are not exploited as sexual objects. 4. Children respect their parents and authority figures such as teachers. 5. Old people are respected, cared for by their families and not put into  institutions when they can no longer care for themselves. 6. People respect each other and each other's property. 7. There is little crime. 8. There is justice. 9. People are honest. 10. There are no homeless people. 11. People do not get into debt by buying things they can't afford on credit. 12. Children have two parents. 13. Orphans are cared for. 14. People put the worldly life in proper perspective, are not beset by psychological problems such as depression and suicide is a rarity. Nuff said Best Regards, Arnold Ali Cender The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites 1. At 03:53 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Ali mian wrote: Ya right... 2. At 03:54 PM on 17 Jul 2007, viola anderson wrote: Arnold Ali Cender, I believe you have just described the GOALS of Islam rather than  the reality; goals, I might add,that are shared by just about every religion on earth. 3. At 03:57 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Lubna. Baghdad wrote: Hi whys,hi whys listeners,hi Ali, i read your letter and it got me thinking alot! Im a twenty  one years old medical student who lives in Baghdad and im a practicing Muslim. There's a  text in the Holy Koran which says-The one who brings life back to a single human being, as if he brought life back to all human beings- This text honours doctors,nurses, firemen,rescue teams and all the people who work to save other people's lives! That's why i pray everyday  so that i'd deserve that honour! Listen Ali,the Prophet Mohammad says-The believers with the most perfect faith are the ones with the most perfect ethics,and the best ones of you are  the ones who are the best to their women- Ali,to me,being a Muslim means as the Prophet Mohammad said-the muslim is the one who people are safe from both his hand and his tongue-  How many Muslims are there who apply this concept in their daily life?! I leave the answer to  you Ali!! Salam! Lubna! Comp 4. At 03:59 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Ali mian wrote: Ya right...#3..what a joke 5. At 04:01 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Steve wrote: When people take religion too seriously, they oppress those that do not, and those of other religions. To like in a religious state would be a step backwards for progress. Sure, some of the things you listed are nice concepts, but no place on earth will be free of crime, no place will have total "justice" (what is that anyways, say if someone wants to leave the fate, but under Islam, apostasy is a capital offense, is that Justice for that person?). If you're happy with no more scientific progress, then fine, but while you'll be living in that religious state, people in my country are planning a trip to Mars, and the technologies created for that will benefit people here on earth. Not everyone wants to live in a religious state, and you're seemingly wanting to impose your way on everyone else, whereas athiests don't impose their beliefs. you're free to practice your religion as you wish in the confines of your home or your mosque, but don't impose your views on everyone else. If you have problems with things, such as alcohol, drugs, or objectifying women, I would recommend you don't drink, don't do drugs, and don't objectify women. That's easier than imposing your views on everyone else. Remember, not everyone shares your beliefs, but I'll respect your way of life if you respect mine and leave me free to live my life as I want. 6. At 04:24 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Virginia Davis wrote: Greetings All and Ali in Baghdad: Thank you for letting us know more about the daily realities of what it means to be a practicing Muslim. Living here in the USA, where there is homelessness, where 25 percent or more of young boys and girls are not safe from monster adults, where females  are not respected in media to the point we have no valid identities, etc etc you are trying to live a life in a society which has value and meaning. In the USA we also live where our leaders are caught up in the hysteria of a never-ending war on terrorism which is  too often against Islam and ignores our own responsibilities for such as the horrific death toll of the men, women and children of Iraq. The Catholics say: If you want peace,work for justice. People of faith, and there are many faiths, do want peace and do work for justice. And you make clear followers of Islam, Muslims, work for a better world. As for the other Ali, I for one, don't need your sarcasm. Virginia Davis of Oregon 7. At 04:47 PM on 17 Jul 2007, arnold ali wrote: Thanks for your comments Steve. I too was an aethiest once until I found it to be an empty ideology. Unfortunately I have to disagree  with your assertion that aetheists do not impose their beliefs on others. On the contrary I cannot walk the streets or watch TV in my  country without being confronted by the sight of scantily-dressed women. I am asked to accept that same-sex relationships have the  same status as marriage between a man and a woman. My wife and daughters may be discriminated against because they cover themselves. My kids are taught that they are descended from apes, despite there being no evidence. I could go on..... 8. At 04:51 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Mark wrote: Islam is not just a religion, it is a political movement which is trying to impose its will on all of humanity. This is why it has fooled western liberal democracies so easily. In their eagerness to be fair, impartial, and allow freedom of all to believe in and practice their own religion, for the longest time they have refused to see that unlike other religions, Islam will not only try to convince others of the correctness of their views but failing that to force them on all of us through violence and tyranny. It isn't the Western media which portrays Islam this way, it is Islam which does this itself and the stories concerning Islam speak for themselves. But you don't have to come to this conclusion on your own, those most adamant about imposing Islam on us all will tell you this openly and explicitly  including people living in Britain who would impose Sharia law on everyone. Unless Islam can put itself in the box of a private affair between  individuals and what they see as their god in their own lives, then as a social movement it cannot and will not be tolerated. Its doctrine is in direct conflict not merely with democracy but with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations. These are the inalienable rights of man which  neither Islam nor anyone else's doctrine can deny to people. http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his  religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his  religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The militant imposition of Islam on all of humanity has been and will continue to be met with whatever resistance is necessary including military force and this could escalate to far more violent and widespread war than we have seen so far. It does not appear some in Islam would be convinced otherwise. 9. At 04:59 PM on 17 Jul 2007, George wrote: You miss the point yourself. "I find all the talk about moderate versus extreme or modern versus fundamental etc quite irrelevant and totally missing the point." When you say this, nothing else you say has the slightest meaning at all. Begging the question does not cut it. You cannot discount mass murder and terrorism then say another word. 10. At 05:02 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Steve wrote: Ali, you simply have a choice to not watch TV or watch TV stations that don't show scantily clad women. I personally cannot stand reality TV shows, so I stopped watching TV except for the history channel. If you have problem with same sex marriage, I would recommend you marry someone of the opposite sex, but let those who  want to to be free to do so. You don't see how you're trying to impose your values? Pro-same sex marriage aren't trying to make you marry someone of the same sex, they just want equal treatment. your view gets them discriminated against. Like it or not, there are homosexuals on this planet, and there always will be. Hate to break it to you, but if you go to any museum about natural history, you'll see skeletons of mammals that lived a long time ago. To deny that evolution exists is to be in denial of life. We're descended from the first single celled creatures. Some  things are a little too complex to just pass off as "I don't really know, it's too complex, thus god just created us". As I said, you're free to practice your religion in the confines of your home and in your mosque, but the influence of religion should end there. What's to stop other people in different religions from imposing their beliefs? Say if Hindus tried to ban beef?  Say if Jews tried to ban shops from being open on Saturday? Religion has no place in public life. I may not believe in God, but I bet you I have far better morals than most religious people out there. Just this past week, a self professed pious Senator in  the US, who spoke so upfront about "Family Values" was outed as having seen prostitutes, yet he spoke out against premarital  sex, etc... 11. At 05:04 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Hisham in France wrote: Hi Ali; Whilst I agree with a lot of what you said on Islam; I'm afraid I have to disagree on some parts: - there is a real chasm between what many consider as "true" tenets of Islam and the reality on the ground: As muslims we  should be at the forefront of the condemnation of all forms of intolerance and other horrors committed in the name of Islam. There is, I'm afraid, a lot of hypocrisy involved in our relation with our own religion (I'm not questioning your sincerity here). I think we should be more cr itical about the political use of Islam, which I believe should be more separated from the worldly dealings with life (although  you said -and rightly so- that it is a way of living). All the bigotry and Islamophobia that annoys you (as well as me) comes partly from the fact that most muslims when confronted by criticisms from others, take it personally and often refuse to make the effort of introspection and self (constructive) criticism. I mean... Islam has historically been a wonderful vehicle of civilization, of assimilation of cultural and religious minorities. The decline started when the Irrational part of it took over all other forms of thinking! we don't allow dissent within our own ranks... which is terribly unhealthy and counterproductive. Muslims used to worship God as well as Beauty, Love and Liberty... Now we are taught to oppress difference. We shouldn't let the Arab Despots nor the Fundamental lunatics nor the neofascits in the west hijack Islam for their own political  purpose.  -secondly; Why is it that Muslims who describe themselves as "secular", are often dismissed as weak Muslims (or  sometimes even... non-Muslims)? It's perfectly right to be a secular muslim: embracing modernity, free thinking and secularism doesn't imply necessarily, abandoning  your identity and faith. You should be more open to this kind of muslims, because I personally believe that they constitute a  growing section of today's muslims. And I think it's a good thing! 12. At 05:07 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Abdelilah Boukili wrote: To Ali, There is an anecdote about a man not living in a Muslim country who embraced Islam.  When he visited some Muslim countries, he thanked God for having embracing it before  visiting them. His conclusion was that he knew Islam in a non-Muslim country but he couldn’t see Islam in those supposedly Muslim countries. Islam is like major religion whose aim is to make the human soul chaste so it can live in bliss in this world and life after this world – called the al akhira. The point you raised are fundamental to all human beings. All religions aspire to make  people honest, fair/just. The core of society is the family whereby individual have a sense of belonging and feel secure. All these notions are grandiose. But religion or any other principle is what you make of it. To my knowledge, all the great religions have common principles by which the individual  is both free and committed. While religion is fundamentally spiritual, there are facts that make people revert to instinct for survival. When there is greed one one side and poverty on the other, one sees just the  immediacy of the action. Spiritual principles are set aside. Christianity and Islam preached peace but ironically, in their history there were the bloodiest incidents, just because religion was the pillar of power for the rulers and each tried to have superiority over the other in the name of the religion. For Islam there was misinterpretation or ignorance of its principles even by some Muslims to justify their greed and material pursuits. As for “Women are not exploited as sexual objects”. That is what  Islam preaches. But in many Muslim societies it was a common practice to have four wives and as many concubines as possible. How the ills in Muslim societies can be fought depends on how Muslims can put their religion in practice without falling into extremes or seeing it as the best just to attack other religions. The same applies to Christians and Jews. The facts that there are different tendencies among Muslims through the like of Sunnis and the Shiites which can lead to fight among them shows that individual practice of Islam alone isn’t the key to peace with oneself. There are external influences that can shake one’s upheld  beliefs in what is halal “permitted” or haram “prohibited”. 13. At 05:08 PM on 17 Jul 2007, jade wrote: we don't need religion to practice these codes. parents can teach us how to behave and schools can reinforce that. there're many causal  & chain reactions on the list: e.g., if kids focus on learning & don't grow up too fast, they can be better educated and may be more responsible in social behaviors, less casual sex, less divorces, less single-parent kids, more educated kids, and the cycle goes on. 14. At 05:17 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Hisham in France wrote: Mark! would you please stop your bigoted bias. you want to talk about religion? OK let me read you matthew chapter ten : according to the Gospel, Jesus said: "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth:  I came not to send peace, but a sword." Stop your fear mongering and start by cleaning your own door step. 15. At 05:33 PM on 17 Jul 2007, Shawn wrote: I think Islam should be judged by its results rather than its intentions. Examine our world today and you will find several countries where Islam holds sway over the government and the population.  Islam has all the political, military, and social power necessary to achieve its lofty ideals. Examine the results of that arrangement honestly and compare it to others where different  religions or secularism holds sway. Then try to honestly tell me that Islam is a positive force in this world.   I don't disagree that Islam has good intentions.   I would argue that Jim Jones, Communists, and Nazis all thought they had good intentions.   I am NOT comparing Islam to any of those groups.   I am pointing out that good intentions don't amount to a hill of beans. Let Islam be judged by its results. ***************** You understand an animal has no immortal soul... Gun Show On The Net.com - Home Page http://www.gunshowonthenet.com/page38.html  http://www.gunshowonthenet.com/index.html http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALaw/LawsofNature.html Those whom allow themselves to be governed by fear, will soon find themselves under its absolute rule.  ********** "The presumption is founded on a law of nature. We know of no more universal instinct than that of self-preservation, -none that so insistently urges to care against injury. It has its motives to exercise in the fear of has its motives to exercise in the fear of pain,  maiming, and death. There are few presumptions based on human feelings or experience that have surer foundation than that expressed in the instruction objected to." - Mr. Justice McKenna, delivering opinion of the U.S Supreme Court in Baltimore & P R CO v. Landrigan, 191 U.S. 461 (1903). Decided December 7, 1903. ********** "... Indeed, this is conceded by counsel for the government, for in their brief ( after referring to certain decisions of this court) it is said: ..." "...'Even though such right be a natural or inalienable right, the duty of protecting the citizen in the enjoyment of such right, free from individual interference, rests alone with the state...." - Mr. Justice Brewer, delivering opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Hodges v.  U.S., 203 U.S. 1 (1906). May 28, 1906. ********** "'The fundamental rights, privileges, and immunities which belong to him as a free  man and a free citizen, now belong to him as a citizen of the United States, and are not dependent upon his citizenship of any state . . . . The Amendment [Fourteenth] does not attempt to confer any new privileges or immunities upon citizens, or to enumerate or define those already existing.   gIt assumes that there are such privileges and immunities, which belong of right to citizens as such, and ordains that they shall not be abridged by state legislation. If this inhibition has no reference to privileges and immunities of this character, but only refers, as held by the majority of the court in their opinion, to such privileges and immunities as were, before its adoption, specially designated in the Constitution, or necessarily implied as belonging to citizens of the United States, it was a vain and idle enactment, which accomplished nothing, and most unnecessarily excited Congress and the people on its passage. With privileges and immunities thus designated or implied no state could ever have interfered by its laws, and no new  constitutional provision was required to inhibit such interference. The supremacy  of the Constitution and the laws of the United States always controlled any state legislation of that character. But, if the Amendment refers to the natural and inalienable rights which belong to all citizens, the inhibition has a profound significance and consequence.'" - Mr. Justice Field, (concurred in by Chief Justice Chase and Justices Swayne and Bradley), U.S. Supreme Court, [Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash. C. C. 371, Fed. Cas. No. 3,230, (p. 95)] As quoted in Twining v. State of New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908). ********** "Who then, it is asked, will pronounce a verdict of guilty upon him if he stops reasoning and follows the first impulse of nature: self-preservation; and further,  whether, while technically he is wrong in his resistance, he is not more sinned  against than sinning; and yet again whether the guilt of those who voted the  unnatural sacrifice is not greater than the wrong of those who now seek to escape by illadvised resistance." - Mr. Justice [Oliver Wendell] Holmes, delivering the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Frohwerk v. U S , 249 U.S. 204 (1919). Decided March 10, 1919. ********** "It is asserted that the right of free speech is a natural and inherent right, and  that it, and the freedom of the press, 'were regarded as among the most sacred and vital possessed by mankind when this nation was born, when its Constitution  was framed and adopted.' And the contention seems necessary for the plaintiff in error to support. But without so deciding or considering the freedom asserted as guaranteed or secured either by the Constitution of the United States or by the Constitution of the state, we pass immediately to the contention, and for the purposes of this case may concede it; that is, concede that the asserted freedom is natural and inherent...." - Mr. Justice McKENNA, delivering the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in GILBERT v. STATE OF MINN., 254 U.S. 325 (1920). ********** "...The law has grown, and even if historical mistakes have contributed to its growth  it has tended in the direction of rules consistent with human nature. Many respectable writers agree that if a man reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death  or grievous bodily harm from his assailant he may stand his ground and that if he kills  him he has not succeeded the bounds of lawful self defence. That has been the decision of this Court. Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550, 559, 15 S. Sup. Ct. 962.  Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife. Therefore  in this Court, at least, it is not a condition of immunity that one in that situation should pause to consider whether a reasonable man might not think it possible to fly with safety or to disable his assailant rather than to kill him..." - Mr. Justice [Oliver Wendell] HOLMES, U.S. Supreme Court, BROWN v. UNITED STATES, 256 U.S. 335 (1921).  ********** "...What the Court did hold was that the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment only protected from state invasion such rights as a person has because he is a citizen of the United States. The Court enumerated some, but refused to enumerate all of these national rights. The majority of the Court emphatically declined the invitation of counsel to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment subjected all state regulatory legislation to continuous censorship by this Court in order for it to determine whether it collided with this Court's opinion of 'natural' right and justice. In  effect, the Slaughter-House cases rejected the very natural justice formula the Court today embraces. The Court did not meet the question of whether the safeguards of the Bill of Rights were protected against state invasion by the Fourteenth Amendment.  And it specifically did not say as the Court now does, that particular provisions of the  Bill of Rights could be breached by states in part, but not breached in other respects, according to this Court's notions of 'civilized standards,' 'canons of decency,' and ' fundamental justice.' "Later, but prior to the Twining case, this Court decided that the following were not ' privileges or immunities' of national citizenship, so as to make them immune against state invasion: the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment,  In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436; the Seventh Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial in civil cases, Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90; the Second Amendment's 'right of the people to keep and bear arms..." "...It was aimed at restraining and checking the powers of wealth and privilege. It was to be a charter of liberty for human rights against property rights. The transformation has been rapid and complete. It operates today to protect the rights of property to the detriment of the rights of man. It has become the Magna Charta of accumulated and  organized capital.'..." - Mr. Justice [Hugo] Black, in dissent, (along with Justices Douglas and Swayne), Adamson v. People Of State Of California, U.S. Supreme Court, June 23, 1947. ********** ""Capitalism is an economic system based on man's right to private property and on his freedom to use that property in producing goods which will earn him a just profit on his investment. Man's right to private property stems from the Natural Law  implanted in him by God. It is as much a part of man's nature as the will to self-preservation." (At 560.)" - MR. Justice Douglas, (in dissent), U.S. Supreme Court, quoting "Arthur J. Hughes' general history text, Man in Time (1964)", in Board OF Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 (1968). Decided June 10, 1968. ********** "Rights of the citizen declared to be --". ********** The ONLY time a citizen of these United States can be legally disarmed, is if  they are imprisoned according to valid usage of law and then government is obligated to provide protection for them. Otherwise, the citizen is in the state of nature and entitled to be able to defend themselves. Anything else would be Repugnant to the United States Constitution, and the  Laws of God, and Nature. The perverse usurpations against our Rights, by government(s) that were formed by us. For the express purpose of protecting those very Rights, must cease immediately. All laws that have been passed, regardless of perverse precedence  applied. Which are unconstitutional in their nature, must be declared Null and Void, by the TRUE rule of law. Our Freedom, our Liberty, and the very lives of ourselves and progeny absolutely depend upon it. ********** "This will be the best security for maintaining our liberties. A nation of well-informed  men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them  cannot be enslaved. It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins." - Ben Franklin ********** "How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" - Samuel Adams, letter to John Pitts, January 21, 1776 ********** "The plain import of the clause is, that congress shall have all the incidental and instrumental powers, necessary and proper to carry into execution all the express  powers. It neither enlarges any power specifically granted; nor is it a grant of any  new power to congress. But it is merely a declaration for the removal of all uncertainty, that the means of carrying into execution those, otherwise granted,  are included in the grant." - Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833. Those whom allow themselves to be governed by fear, will soon find themselves under its absolute rule. 2006GunShowOnTheNet.com

  

Last Update 2008-11-03 | Copyright© Charles Mingus 2008 | |